SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Jubilee Party of Kenya v Agnes Ndunge Mutwiwa [2017] KEHC 9387 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 9387 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
9387
Citation
[2017] KEHC 9387 (KLR)
Decided
5 September 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeElection Nomination AppealPostureAppeal from the Political Parties Disputes TribunalCoramNyarangi
Holding

The Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to hear and determine the Respondent's Complaint, and the Judgment and Decree are set aside.

Facts

The Respondent, Agnes Ndunge Mutwiwa, filed a complaint against the Appellant, Jubilee Party of Kenya, alleging that the Party List of Nominees for Murang'a County Assembly did not reflect the regional diversity of the people of Murang'a County. The Respondent sought to be included in the List of Nominees.

Issues

  1. Tribunal's jurisdiction
  2. Compulsory reconstitution of Party List

Reasoning

The Tribunal was not an appropriate option for the Respondent to seek redress, as it did not consider the legal provisions attendant to nomination and the compilation of Party Lists. The Tribunal proceeded to assume jurisdiction without ensuring strict compliance with the law.

Outcome

Appeal allowed, Judgment and Decree of the Political Parties Disputes Tribunal set aside

Orders

  • Judgment and Decree of the Tribunal set aside
  • Each party to bear own costs

Authorities cited

Legislation (5)
  • Political Parties Act, 2011
  • Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission Act, 2011
  • Elections Act, 2011
  • Elections (General) Regulations, 2012
  • Elections (Party Primaries and Party Lists) Regulations, 2017
Cases cited (1)
  • Owners of Motor Vessel Lillian S vs. Caltex Oil (Kenya) Ltd (1989) KLR 1
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case