SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Johnson Otieno Adera v Mohan Galot [2017] KEHC 9460 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 9460 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
9460
Citation
[2017] KEHC 9460 (KLR)
Decided
21 September 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPosturePlaintiff filed a libel suit against the Defendant, but the Defendant filed a preliminary objection.CoramB. Thurani Jaden
Holding

The preliminary objection is dismissed as the matter is justiciable and the court has jurisdiction to hear the case.

Facts

The Plaintiff, Johnson Otieno Adera, sued the Defendant, Mohan Galot, claiming that the Defendant published a defamatory letter to the Minister for Justice, National Cohesion and Constitutional Affairs. The Defendant denied any malice and publication.

Issues

  1. Whether the Defendant’s right to protection of law, right to equality and freedom from discrimination, right to human dignity and the right to fair and administrative action enshrined in Article 27, 28 and 47 of the Constitution read with the Public officers and Ethics Act, 2003 (Act No. 4 of 2003) entitled the Plaintiff to institute libel proceedings.
  2. Whether the libel proceedings subvert and/or violate the principles and values of justice, accountability, transparency, human rights and the Rule of law embodied in Articles 10, 47 and 50 of the Constitution.

Reasoning

The court found that the preliminary objection was not a pure point of law and that facts required to be ascertained during the hearing of the case. The matter is justiciable and the court has jurisdiction to hear the case.

Outcome

The preliminary objection is dismissed.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Constitution of Kenya (Supervisory Jurisdiction and Protection of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms of the Individual) High Court Practice and Procedure Rules, 2006
Cases cited (1)
  • Mukisa Biscuits Manufacturing Co Ltd Vs West End Distributors (1969) Ea 696
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case