SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

National Lands Commission v Tom Ojienda & Associates [2018] KEHC 10171 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 10171 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
10171
Citation
[2018] KEHC 10171 (KLR)
Decided
20 September 2018
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeTaxation of CostsPostureReference under Advocates (Remuneration) OrderCoramJustice Ochieng, S.A. Opande
Holding

The instruction fees were set aside and the bill of costs was re-taxed by the taxing master S.A. Opande, awarding Ksh 40 million to the advocate.

Facts

NLC instructed Tom Ojienda to file a reference before the Supreme Court regarding the mandate between NLC and the Ministry of Land Housing & Urban Development. The Supreme Court delivered an advisory opinion. NLC filed a reference against the taxation of the advocate/client bill of costs, which was set aside by Justice Ochieng. The case was then referred back to a different taxing master, who taxed the instruction fees at Ksh 65 million.

Issues

  1. Taxation of instruction fees in the advocate/client bill of costs
  2. Discretion of the taxing master in awarding fees

Reasoning

The court upheld the taxing master's decision to re-tax the instruction fees, considering the special expertise and research required for the Supreme Court reference.

Outcome

The instruction fees were set aside and the bill of costs was re-taxed by the taxing master S.A. Opande, awarding Ksh 40 million to the advocate.

Orders

  • Instruction fees set aside
  • Bill of costs re-taxed by taxing master S.A. Opande

Authorities cited

Cases cited (3)
  • Premchand Raichand Ltd vs Quarry Services of East Africa Limited
  • Kipkorir, Tito & Kiara Advocates vs Deposit Protection Fund Board
  • Arthur vs Nyeri Electricity Undertaking
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case