SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Whispering Palms Estate Ltd & 3 others v Cyprian Nyakundi & 4 others [2018] KEHC 2498 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 2498 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2498
Citation
[2018] KEHC 2498 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeDefamationPostureAppeal from a lower court decisionCoramJ.K. SERGON
Holding

The court allows the motion and issues a temporary injunction to restrain the 1st respondent from tweeting/posting, publishing and broadcasting the offensive tweets, posts, words, publications and utterances and the statements attributed to Meshack Onyango Dehay alias Meshack Onyango Dihay which were published on the 1st defendant's twitter handle on 30.4.2018, 2.5.2018, 4.5.2018, 7.5.2018, 8.5.2018 and 10.5.2018.

Facts

The plaintiffs, Whispering Palms Estate Ltd and others, filed a motion seeking injunctions against the defendants, Cyprian Nyakundi and others, to prevent them from publishing defamatory tweets and statements on social media platforms.

Issues

  1. Whether the plaintiffs have a prima facie case of defamation
  2. Whether the defendants can be held responsible for the defamatory tweets and statements on social media

Reasoning

The court found that the tweets/posts/words/matters/publications/utterances/and statements cannot be justified at this stage and that the plaintiffs have a prima facie case of defamation.

Outcome

The motion is granted, and the appropriate orders are issued.

Orders

  • Temporary injunction pending the hearing of this suit to restrain the 1st respondent from tweeting/posting, publishing and broadcasting the offensive tweets, posts, words, publications and utterances and the statements attributed to Meshack Onyango Dehay alias Meshack Onyango Dihay which were published on the 1st defendant's twitter handle on 30.4.2018, 2.5.2018, 4.5.2018, 7.5.2018, 8.5.2018 and 10.5.2018.

Remedies

  • Costs are to be borne by each party
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case