SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenya Ports Authority v Ali Chege Waichogo [2018] KEHC 363 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 363 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
363
Citation
[2018] KEHC 363 (KLR)
Decided
20 November 2018
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
Typecivil appealPostureappeal from the judgment and decree of Hon Joyce Gacheru, (SRM) Court at MombasaCoramA., JOHN GACHAN, KLR Mabeya
Holding

The main issues for determination are whether the suit by the Respondent was time barred and on liability.

Facts

The Respondent, Ali Chege Waichogo, instituted a suit against the Appellant, Kenya Ports Authority, claiming for general damages for malicious prosecution and defamation. The Appellant raised the issue of the suit being statute barred.

Issues

  1. whether the Respondent's suit against the Appellant was statute barred and therefore incapable of being revived by way of extension of the limitation period
  2. whether the Respondent proved his case to the required standards
  3. whether the damages that were awarded to the Respondent were excessive

Reasoning

The court found that the Respondent was not aware of the one-year limitation period and did not provide an explanation for the delay. The court also noted that the Appellant raised the issue of the suit being statute barred.

Outcome

The appeal was dismissed.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (3)
  • Industrial & Commercial Development Corporation Versus Otachi (1977) KLR 101 (1976-1980) 1 KLR 529
  • Abok James Odera t/a A.J Odera & Associates v John Patrick Machira t/a Machira & Co. Advocates [2013] eKLR
  • Kenya Ports Authority versus Kusthon (Kenya) Limited (2009) 2EA 212
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case