SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Elizabeth Kavere & another v Lilian Atho & another [2018] KEHC 3734 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 3734 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
3734
Citation
[2018] KEHC 3734 (KLR)
Decided
2 October 2018
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil SuitPostureApplication for entry of judgment in default of appearance and defenceCoramEDWARD M. MURIITHI
Holding

Judgment shall be entered in favor of the plaintiffs as against the 1st defendant only for the liquidated claim of Ksh.25,537,900/- together with interest at court rates from the date of the suit and costs of the suit.

Facts

The plaintiffs, Elizabeth Kavere and Teresa Gimisi, requested judgment against the defendants, Lilian Atho and Real Time Company Ltd., for a refund of capital investment and profits, interest, and damages due to a breach of contract. The defendants failed to appear and file their statements of defence.

Issues

  1. Jurisdiction to enter judgment in default of appearance and defence
  2. Service of summons

Reasoning

The court found that the defendants failed to appear and file their statements of defence, and the service of summons on the 1st defendant was valid. The 2nd defendant, as a separate legal entity, could not be served in the same manner.

Outcome

In favor of the plaintiffs as against the 1st defendant only

Orders

  • Judgment in favor of the plaintiffs as against the 1st defendant only for the liquidated claim of Ksh.25,537,900/- together with interest at court rates from the date of the suit and costs of the suit

Remedies

  • Refund of capital investment and profits
  • Interest at court rates
  • General damages
  • Costs of the suit

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010
Cases cited (1)
  • BUGERERE COFFEE GROWERS LTD v. SEBADUKA (1970) E.A 147
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case