SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Nyota Tissue Products v Lawrence Lawi Kuboka & 4 others [2018] KEHC 4638 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 4638 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
4638
Citation
[2018] KEHC 4638 (KLR)
Decided
19 July 2018
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeApplication for Stay of ExecutionPostureAppellant seeks stay of execution of judgment in Eldama Ravine SPMCC No. 22 of 2013CoramKoome, Porter
Holding

The court denied the stay of execution, finding that the appellant did not show substantial loss and that the application was filed with unreasonable delay.

Facts

Appellant filed an application for stay of execution of a judgment in Eldama Ravine SPMCC No. 22 of 2013, which was delivered on 3rd November 2015. The judgment held the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd respondents 20% liable and the 4th and 5th respondents 80%. The 5th defendant/applicant made an application for stay of execution, which was granted with conditions.

Issues

  1. Whether to grant stay of execution pending appeal
  2. Whether the appellant has shown substantial loss that would result if the stay is not granted

Reasoning

The court found that the appellant did not provide evidence to show substantial loss and that the application was filed 7 months after the judgment was delivered. The court also noted that the respondents had already paid their part of the decretal sum.

Outcome

The court denied the stay of execution.

Orders

  • The court denied the stay of execution pending appeal

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Rules, Order 42 Rule 6
  • Civil Procedure Rules, Order 42 Rule 7
Cases cited (4)
  • Channan Agricultural Contractors
  • Kenya Shell Limited v. Benjamin Karuga Kibiru & Anor
  • Butt v. Rent Restriction Tribunal Civil Appeal No. Nairobi 6 of 1979
  • Machira t/a Machira & Co. Advocates
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case