SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mutisya Muthangya v Paul Manundu Musili [2018] KEHC 5548 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 5548 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
5548
Citation
[2018] KEHC 5548 (KLR)
Decided
12 June 2018
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from a Magistrate's JudgmentCoramL. N. MUTENDE
Holding

The Appellant is awarded Kshs. 95,000/= as general damages less contribution of 50% which comes to Kshs. 47,500/=. He is also awarded costs in the Lower Court and of this Appeal.

Facts

A pedestrian, Mutisya Muthangya, was injured in a road traffic accident caused by the Respondent, Paul Manundu Musili, who was driving a Toyota Saloon Station Wagon.

Issues

  1. Whether the Magistrate misdirected himself by holding the Appellant 100% liable for the accident
  2. Whether the Magistrate's delay in delivering the Judgment was justified
  3. Whether the Appellant's conviction in a Traffic Case was conclusive evidence of his liability in a subsequent civil trial

Reasoning

The Court found that both the Appellant and Respondent contributed to the accident, and the Magistrate's finding of 100% liability for the Appellant was not supported by the evidence.

Outcome

Appeal allowed in part, Judgment set aside and apportioned liability at 50:50

Orders

  • Judgment set aside and apportioned liability at 50:50

Remedies

  • Kshs. 95,000/= as general damages
  • Costs in the Lower Court and of this Appeal

Authorities cited

Cases cited (3)
  • Selle vs. Associated Motor Boat Company Ltd (1968) EA 123
  • Mbogo vs. Shah and Another (1968) EA 93
  • Phillip Keipto Chemwolo & Mumias Sugar Company LTD vs. Augustine Kubende (1982 – 88) IKAR 1036
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case