SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Ndugu Transport Company Limited & another v Daniel Mwangi Waithaka Leteipa [2018] KEHC 5672 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 5672 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
5672
Citation
[2018] KEHC 5672 (KLR)
Decided
3 July 2018
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from a judgment of the Hon. B. Limo (SRM) in Kericho CMCC No. 185 of 2015CoramLenaola
Holding

The court held that the trial court erred in awarding Kshs.200,000 to the respondent for loss of use, as such claims must be supported by specific proof of earnings.

Facts

The respondent Daniel Waithaka Leteipa claimed Kshs.200,000 for loss of use of his motor vehicle, which was a public service vehicle (PSV). He had a PSV license and had worked for 2 years, earning Kshs.6,500 per day. The vehicle was assessed to have a pre-accident value of Ksh.1,295,000 and a salvage value of around Kshs.75,000, making it a write-off. The respondent did not provide receipts for his daily earnings.

Issues

  1. Whether the trial court erred in awarding Kshs.200,000 to the respondent for loss of use

Reasoning

The court considered various cases and held that the amount of earnings from a business is a special damage that must be specifically proved. Without such proof, it cannot be awarded. The court found that the respondent did not provide sufficient evidence to support his claim for loss of use.

Outcome

Affirmed

Authorities cited

Cases cited (4)
  • Premier Diary Limited vs Amarjit Singh Sagoo & Another [2013] eKLR
  • M O R vs Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate [2017] eKLR
  • Summer Limited Meru vs Moses Kithinji Nkanata [2006] eKLR
  • Ryce Motors Ltd and Anor – vs – Muroki (1995-1998) 2 EA 363
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case