SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Jospeh Gichuhi Thomas v K G (Minor suing through his mother and next friend S N N) [2018] KEHC 6041 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 6041 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
6041
Citation
[2018] KEHC 6041 (KLR)
Decided
7 June 2018
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from a decision on damages awarded by a trial magistrateCoramJOEL NGUGI
Holding

The appeal is dismissed with costs as the award of Kshs. 1,800,000/- for general damages is not excessive.

Facts

The Respondent, K G, filed a civil claim against the Appellant, Joseph Gichuhi Thomas, in Thika Chief Magistrate's Court. The parties recorded a consent on liability, apportioning 70% to the Plaintiff and 30% to the Defendant. The contentious issue was the quantum of damages.

Issues

  1. The Appellant's claim that the learned trial magistrate erred in awarding general damages of Kshs. 1,800,000/-
  2. The Appellant's claim that the learned trial magistrate failed to consider the medical reports and Appellant's submissions on general damages
  3. The Appellant's claim that the learned trial magistrate arrived at a wrong decision prejudicing the Appellant

Reasoning

The court considered the medical reports and the Appellant's submissions, but found the award of Kshs. 1,800,000/- for general damages not excessive. The court cited other cases where similar injuries resulted in lower awards.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed with costs

Authorities cited

Cases cited (2)
  • MR (Minor) v Patrick Magama & Another (Mombasa HCCC No. 491 of 1992)
  • Patrick Mutie Kamay v Judy Wambui Kibara (Civil Appeal No. 254 of 1996)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case