SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Ngugi Mwangi & Co. Advocates v Alloy Steel Castings Limited (Miscellaneous Civil Application 178 of 2017) [2018] KEHC 733 (KLR) (Commercial and Tax) (6 December 2018) (Ruling)

[2018] KEHC 733 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
733
Citation
[2018] KEHC 733 (KLR)
Decided
6 December 2018
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeMiscellaneous Civil ApplicationPostureRespondent seeks to determine the retainer of the Applicant/Client in a previous case.CoramRACHEL NGETICH
Holding

The Advocate/Respondent has failed to demonstrate that the Client/Applicant retained the firm of Ngugi Mwangi & Co. Advocates to act in Milimani CMCC No. 9772 of 2006.

Facts

The Applicant/Applicant disputes the issuance of instructions to represent the Respondent in Milimani CMCC Case No. 9772 of 2006. The Respondent instructed Maosa & Company Advocates to file the suit, and the Respondent claims never to have retained Ngugi Mwangi & Co. Advocates.

Issues

  1. Whether Ngugi Mwangi & Co. Advocates were retained by Alloy Steel Castings Limited to act in Milimani CMCC Case No. 9772 of 2006.
  2. Whether the Applicant/Client disputes the issuance of instructions to represent the Respondent in the previous case.

Reasoning

The Respondent's affidavit and the attached plaint confirm that Maosa & Company Advocates filed the suit, and the Respondent claims never to have retained Ngugi Mwangi & Co. Advocates. The Applicant/Advocate failed to demonstrate receipt of instructions.

Outcome

The Advocate herein was not retained by ALLOY STEEL CASTINGS LIMITED to act on their behalf in Milimani CMCC No. 9772 of 2006.

Orders

  • The Advocate herein was not retained by ALLOY STEEL CASTINGS LIMITED to act on their behalf in Milimani CMCC No. 9772 of 2006.
  • Costs of this application to the Client/Applicant
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case