SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Martha Wangari Karua & another v Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission & 3 others [2018] KEHC 7606 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 7606 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
7606
Citation
[2018] KEHC 7606 (KLR)
Decided
6 April 2018
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeElection PetitionPostureAppeal from a Court of Appeal RulingCoramAs Cory, Gitari, Lakha, McLachlinJ, Mwakasendo, Nyarangi
Holding

The High Court lacks jurisdiction to hear the election petition as it was not filed within the six-month timeline provided by the Constitution and the Elections Act.

Facts

The petitioners filed an election petition against the respondent authorities, alleging irregularities in the election of a County Governor. The petition was lodged on September 5, 2017, and the respondents raised jurisdictional objections.

Issues

  1. Jurisdiction of the High Court to hear the election petition within six months
  2. Whether the Court of Appeal had jurisdiction to remit the case to the High Court

Reasoning

The Court determined that the petition was filed beyond the six-month timeline set by Article 105(1) of the Constitution and Section 75 of the Elections Act, rendering the High Court's jurisdiction invalid.

Outcome

The High Court dismissed the petition due to lack of jurisdiction.

Orders

  • The petition was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Article 87 of the Constitution
  • Article 105 of the Constitution
  • Elections Act Chapter 7 of the Laws of Kenya
Cases cited (2)
  • Evans Kidero & 4 Others v Ferdinard Ndungu Waititu and Lemanken Aramat -V- Harun Maitamei Lempaka & 2 Others
  • Lemanken Aramat -V- Harun Maitamei Lempaka & 2 Others
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case