SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Onsongo & Company Advocates v African Merchant Assurance Company Limited [2018] KEHC 808 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 808 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
808
Citation
[2018] KEHC 808 (KLR)
Decided
20 December 2018
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeMiscellaneous Civil ApplicationPostureApplicant seeks to convert a certificate of taxation into a judgment and award interest on taxed costs.CoramT.W. CHERERE
Holding

The notice of motion is allowed, and judgment is entered for the advocate against the respondent for Kshs. 52,200. Interest shall accrue on the taxed costs at 14% per annum from 5th April, 2018 until payment in full. The advocate will also have the costs of the application.

Facts

The applicant acted as an advocate in a case (HCCA No. 43 of 2012) and the bill of costs was taxed for Kshs. 52,200. The client has not paid the amount, and the applicant seeks judgment for the entire sum.

Issues

  1. Whether the certificate of taxation can be converted into a judgment.
  2. Whether interest on taxed costs can be awarded at 14% per annum from 30 days after the date of service of the bill of costs.

Reasoning

There is no dispute as to the retainer, and the certificate of taxation has not been set aside or altered. The court has discretion to enter judgment on the certificate of taxation where there is no dispute as to the retainer.

Outcome

Judgment in favor of the applicant.

Orders

  • Judgment for the advocate against the respondent for Kshs. 52,200.
  • Interest on taxed costs at 14% per annum from 5th April, 2018 until payment in full.
  • Advocate will have the costs of the application.

Remedies

  • Judgment for the advocate against the respondent for Kshs. 52,200.
  • Interest on taxed costs at 14% per annum from 5th April, 2018 until payment in full.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Advocates Remuneration Order, 2019
Cases cited (1)
  • Musyoka & Wambua Advocates Vs Rustam Hira Advocate (2006) eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case