SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Dyphinah M. Khaonjeli v Waziri Abubakari Ali & 3 others [2018] KEHC 8335 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 8335 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
8335
Citation
[2018] KEHC 8335 (KLR)
Decided
22 February 2018
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePostureAppeal from a final orderCoramS. MUKUNYA
Holding

The court allows the plaintiff's amended originating summons with costs, finding that the plaintiff has proved her claim in adverse possession.

Facts

The plaintiff, Dyphinah M. Khaonjeli, claimed adverse possession of a portion of land (Ndivisi/Muchi/2120) registered in the names of Waziri Abubakari Ali. The plaintiff subdivided the land and registered the portion she occupied (Ndivisi/Muchi/5169) in the names of Bakari Orata Amisi and Athumani Wesonga Waziri. The plaintiff sought to determine her notorious possession and the validity of the transfer.

Issues

  1. Whether the plaintiff has been in notorious possession of land measuring 25 yards x 10 yards out of the original Ndivisi/Muchi/2120
  2. Whether the plaintiff's title to the portion of 25 x 10 yards has been extinguished upon her occupation of over 12 years
  3. Whether the transfer to the 2nd and 3rd respondents was lawful or intended to defeat the interests of the plaintiff

Reasoning

The court found that the plaintiff had been in possession of the land for over 12 years and had acquired title by adverse possession. The defendant's title was extinguished due to the plaintiff's occupation.

Outcome

The plaintiff's amended originating summons is allowed with costs.

Orders

  • Allow the plaintiff's amended originating summons with costs

Remedies

  • Allow the plaintiff's amended originating summons with costs

Authorities cited

Cases cited (2)
  • Lusenaka & Another Versus. Omocha KLR[1994]
  • Githu Vs. Ndeete KLR [1980]
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case