SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Nicholas Mwatika Mulei v National Land Commission & 3 others [2018] KEHC 8375 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 8375 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
8375
Citation
[2018] KEHC 8375 (KLR)
Decided
30 January 2018
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypePetition for Judicial ReviewPostureRespondent's appeal from a decision of the National Land CommissionCoramPresiding Judge
Holding

The NLC had jurisdiction to review the grants and dispositions of public land, including the suit property, which was initially allocated to the Petitioner but later to the 1st Interested Party.

Facts

The suit property is a leasehold parcel of land that was initially allocated to the Petitioner in 1996 and later to the 1st Interested Party in 1997. The Petitioner and the 1st Interested Party both have grants over the property, but the 1st Interested Party claims the Petitioner unlawfully acquired the title.

Issues

  1. Whether the NLC had jurisdiction to adjudicate the dispute between the Petitioner and the 1st Interested Party.
  2. Whether the Petitioner's rights have been violated.
  3. What reliefs may be available to the Petitioner.

Reasoning

The court held that the NLC's mandate under the Constitution and the National Land Commission Act extends to reviewing grants and dispositions of public land, including the suit property, even if it was initially allocated to the Petitioner.

Outcome

The NLC's decision to revoke the Petitioner's title was upheld.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • National Land Commission Act (Cap 5A)
Cases cited (3)
  • R v National Land Commission Ex P Krystalline Salt Limited
  • R v National Land Commission & 4 others Ex P Futson Company Limited
  • R v National Land Commission Ex parte Holborn Properties Ltd
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case