Washington Jakoyo Midiwo v Independent Electoral Boundaries Commission & 2 others [2018] KEHC 8475 (KLR)
- Court
- High Court of Kenya
- Case number
- 8475
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 8475 (KLR)
- Decided
- 26 February 2018
AI Summary
Beta
Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeElection PetitionPosturePetitioner seeks to invalidate the election resultsCoramE. N. MAINA
Holding
The petition is dismissed.
Facts
The petitioner contests the election results of the Member of the National Assembly for Gem Constituency, alleging that the election was not free, fair, transparent, and impartial.
Issues
- Whether the election was free, fair, transparent, impartial and accountable.
- Whether the votes were counted, tabulated, tallied and announced in accordance with the Constitution, Elections Act and regulations.
- Whether the transmission of results from polling stations to the Constituency Tallying Center was conducted in accordance with the law and affected the result.
- Whether there were illegalities and irregularities in the conduct of the election.
- Whether the 3rd Respondent was validly declared as the winner.
- Who bears the costs of the petition.
Reasoning
The court must be convinced that the election was not conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Constitution and the law or that it was beset by irregularities affecting the results. The burden of proof lies with the petitioner.
Outcome
Petition dismissed
Orders
- Award of costs to the respondents
- Issue of a certificate to the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission and the Speaker of the National Assembly
Authorities cited
Legislation (3)
- Constitution of Kenya
- Elections Act
- Elections (General) Regulations, 2012
Cases cited (2)
- Raila Amolo Odinga & Another v Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & 4 others & Attorney General & Another EP No. 1 of 2017
- Gatirau Munya v Dickson Mwenda Githinji and 2 Others (2014) eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Loading judgment…