SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Kenya Medical Laboratories Technicians and Technologists Board Ex-Parte Archdiocese Nairobi Kenya Registered Trustees [2018] KEHC 9303 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 9303 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
9303
Citation
[2018] KEHC 9303 (KLR)
Decided
16 July 2018
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureEx parte application for prohibition against the Kenya Medical Laboratories Technicians and Technologists BoardCoramAs Ngcobo, Joubert, See Wallis, Wessels
Holding

The Board's mandate extends to training, business, practice, and employment, and the Medical Practitioners and Dentists Act does not cover the ex parte applicants, hence, the Board has no power to levy license fees.

Facts

The ex parte applicant, the Archdiocese Nairobi Kenya Registered Trustees, operates health institutions with hospital and medical laboratories and employs laboratory technicians and technologists. The Respondent, the Kenya Medical Laboratories Technicians and Technologists Board, is a body corporate established under the Medical Laboratory Technicians and Technologists Act.

Issues

  1. scope of the Board's mandate under section 5 of the Act
  2. proper construction of the exceptions provided under section 20 (2) (b) (iii) of the Act
  3. application or otherwise of the Medical Practitioners and Dentists Act in licensing and regulating private hospital and medical laboratories

Reasoning

The Board's mandate under section 5 of the Act includes training, business, practice, and employment, which are not covered by the Medical Practitioners and Dentists Act.

Outcome

The ex parte application is dismissed.

Orders

  • The ex parte application is dismissed.
  • The ex parte applicant is ordered to pay the Respondent's costs of the application.

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Medical Laboratory Technicians and Technologists Act
  • Medical Practitioners and Dentists Act
  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010
Cases cited (13)
  • Civil Appeal No. 273 of 2003
  • AAA Investments (Pty) Ltd v Micro Finance Regulatory Council
  • Albutt vs Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation
  • Fedsure Life 11 Assurance Ltd v Greater Johannesburg Transitional Metropolitan Council
  • Albutt vs Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation
  • Act No. 10 of 1999
  • Cap 253A, Laws of Kenya
  • Onochie vs Odogwu
  • Supreme Court of Nigeria
  • Sutter vs Scheepers
  • World Bank
  • Boillot, F. 2009
  • Supreme Court of Nigeria
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case