SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Bonventure Odeyo Obuyu & another v Bernard Mulembo Namwamba & another [2019] KEHC 11069 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 11069 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
11069
Citation
[2019] KEHC 11069 (KLR)
Decided
28 February 2019
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureApplication for leave to enjoin an interested party and for directionsCoramWambiliangah
Holding

The court allows the application to enjoin the intended interested party and directs them to implement the decree, but the Applicants must pay the costs of the application.

Facts

The Applicants obtained a decree in 2015 granting them a declaration that a plot of land is part of the estate of the late Elias Malomba Obuyu. The judgment debtor, Bernard Mulembo Namwamba, registered the plot in his name. The Applicants sought to enforce the decree, but the intended interested party, the Ministry of Lands, refused to implement it.

Issues

  1. Whether the court can enjoin the intended interested party in a concluded case
  2. Whether the court can direct the intended interested party to implement the decree

Reasoning

The court found that the intended interested party was not a party to the proceedings and that the judgment was not addressed to them. The court emphasized the need to ensure justice is done and that the decree is not defeated.

Outcome

Application allowed

Orders

  • Enjoin the intended interested party to implement the decree
  • Direct the intended interested party to implement the decree

Remedies

  • Enjoin the intended interested party to implement the decree
  • Direct the intended interested party to implement the decree

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Civil Procedure Rules
Cases cited (2)
  • R v Commissioner of Lands: Misc. Appl. No. 96 of 1998
  • Mike Maina v Commissioner of Lands & others: Civil Appeal No. 221/1997
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case