SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mwilu v Prosecutions & 3 others; Kiima (Interested Party); Kenya Chapter (Amicus Curiae) (Petition 295 of 2018) [2019] KEHC 11366 (KLR) (Constitutional and Human Rights) (31 May 2019) (Judgment)

[2019] KEHC 11366 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
11366
Citation
[2019] KEHC 11366 (KLR)
Decided
31 May 2019
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypePetition for Judicial ReviewPostureRespondents' appeal from a High Court decisionCoramDC, Deputy, IC, Lamer, M., Onguto, The, Warsame
Holding

The arrest and interrogation of the Petitioner were unlawful and in violation of her rights to a fair trial and due process

Facts

Petitioner, Hon. Philomena Mbete Mwilu, was arrested and interrogated by the Director of Criminal Investigations (DCI) and the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) on charges of corruption without prior notice or summons. She was subsequently presented for plea in court but the proceedings were adjourned.

Issues

  1. Whether the arrest and interrogation of the Petitioner were in accordance with the law and due process
  2. Whether the arrest and interrogation were politically motivated

Reasoning

The court found that the arrest and interrogation were conducted without proper legal authority and in a manner that was politically motivated, thus violating the Petitioner's rights.

Outcome

Affirmed the decision of the lower court

Orders

  • Affirmed the decision of the lower court
  • Remanded the case to the DCI for a fresh investigation

Remedies

  • Remand of the case to the DCI for a fresh investigation

Authorities cited

Legislation (4)
  • Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions Act (Act No. 2 of 2013)
  • Magistrates' Courts Act, No. 56 of 2015
  • National Police Service Act
  • Constitution of Kenya
Cases cited (1)
  • Raila Amolo Odinga & Another v The Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission and 2 Others, Supreme Court Presidential Petition No. 1 of 2017
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.5 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case