SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v JP. Maiywo & 2 others sued as the Executive Director, Treasurer and Secretary respectively of Central Kenya Conference (CKC); Moses Nyankuru & 23 others (Interested Parties) Ex parte Humphrey Nguma Macharia & another [2019] KEHC 11627 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 11627 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
11627
Citation
[2019] KEHC 11627 (KLR)
Decided
8 July 2019
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureApplication for Judicial Review Orders of Certiorari and ProhibitionCoramIL, In, Mokgoro, Nyamweya, Supreme Court Justice, Waki
Holding

The court found that the applicants had not exhausted the internal disputes resolution mechanism and the application was dismissed.

Facts

The applicants (JP. Maiywo, Peter Nyaga, John Kiragu, Peter Kiko, Jeremy Marambii) sued as the Executive Director, Treasurer and Secretary of Central Kenya Conference (CKC) against Moses Nyankuru and 23 others (Interested Parties) over the nomination of church officers in Nairobi Central Seventh-Day Adventist Church (NCSDAC). The applicants alleged that the Respondents (Interested Parties) did not exhaust the internal disputes resolution mechanism before making the nomination.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicants had exhausted the fourth Respondents internal disputes resolution mechanism(s)
  2. Whether the impugned decision and actions by the Respondents and the interested parties are amenable to judicial review
  3. Whether the application meets the test for the court to grant leave to institute judicial review proceedings

Reasoning

The court determined that the objections raised by the objectors were not addressed within the internal mechanism and thus, the applicants failed to exhaust the internal disputes resolution mechanism.

Outcome

The application was dismissed.

Orders

  • The application for judicial review was dismissed.
  • The applicants were ordered to pay the costs of the Respondents.

Authorities cited

Legislation (4)
  • Law Reform Act, Cap 26
  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010
  • Fair Administrative Action Act, 2015
Cases cited (9)
  • Canara Bank vs. Debasis Das
  • JR App No. 201 of 2018
  • Article 47(1) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010
  • Cap 26, Laws of Kenya
  • Petition No. 65 of 2010
  • Nairobi Petition No. 407 of 2012
  • Seventh Day Adventist Church East Africa Limited v Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Nairobi Metropolitan Development & Another
  • Serious Economic Offences vs Hyundai Motor Distributors (Pty) Ltd
  • Mombasa HCMISC APP No 384 of 1996
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.3 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case