SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Wanjuki Muchemi v Standard Group Limited & 2 others [2019] KEHC 1347 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 1347 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1347
Citation
[2019] KEHC 1347 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeDefamationPostureAppeal from the original trial outcomeCoramA. MBOGHOLI MSAGHA
Holding

The court finds the defendants' publication defamatory and awards Ksh.15 million in general damages and Ksh.2 million in exemplary damages.

Facts

The plaintiff, Wanjuki Muchemi, was the Solicitor General of Kenya at the time. He advised the Ministry of Medical Services to pay Ksh.66 million for hospital equipment, which was later found to be inflated costs. The defendants, Standard Group Limited and two others, published a defamatory article about the plaintiff in their newspaper.

Issues

  1. Whether the defendants' publication was defamatory
  2. The appropriate amount of damages to award

Reasoning

The court found the publication to be defamatory as it portrayed the plaintiff as corrupt, dishonest, and fraudulent. The court balanced the principles set out in the cited cases and the positions of the respective persons in society.

Outcome

The plaintiff is awarded Ksh.15 million in general damages and Ksh.2 million in exemplary damages.

Orders

  • No permanent injunction or apology is made

Remedies

  • General damages of Ksh.15 million and exemplary damages of Ksh.2 million

Authorities cited

Cases cited (6)
  • C. A. M vs Royal Media Services Limited (2013)eKLR
  • Mwangi Kiunjuri Vs Wangethi Mwangi & 2 others (2016) eKLR
  • Johnson Evans Gicheru Vs Andrew Motton & another (2005)eKLR
  • Samuel Ndungu Mukunya Vs Nation Media Group Limited & another (2015)eKLR
  • Dr. Christopher Ndarathi Murungaru Vs John Githongo (2019)eKLR
  • Nation Media Group Limited and 2 Others Vs John Joseph Kamotho & 3 others (2010)eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case