SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Robinson Onyango Malombo t/a O.M Robinson & Co. Advocates v County Government of Mombasa [2019] KEHC 2377 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 2377 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2377
Citation
[2019] KEHC 2377 (KLR)
Decided
6 November 2019
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureAppeal from a previous judgmentCoramE. K. OGOLA
Holding

The application is not anchored properly in law and cannot be the basis to challenge any taxations herein. The taxation of the Bill of Costs in Civil Application No. 187 of 2015 was a nullity ab-initio and is set aside.

Facts

The applicant seeks to challenge the taxation of a bill of costs in Civil Application No. 187 of 2015 and the judgment in Civil Application No. 284 of 2015.

Issues

  1. Whether the application is properly anchored in law
  2. Whether Civil Application No. 187 of 2015 was properly taxed before this Court

Reasoning

The application is anchored under Order 8 rule 8; Order 10 rule 11 and Order 45 of the Civil Procedure Rules and Sections 3, 3A and 3B of the Civil Procedure Act. The application is not properly anchored in law and fails to satisfy the grant of the orders sought.

Outcome

The application is dismissed and the taxation of the Bill of Costs in Civil Application No. 187 of 2015 is set aside.

Orders

  • The taxation of the Bill of Costs in Civil Application No. 187 of 2015 is set aside.
  • Each party to bear own costs.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case