SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Julius Mwema Nyuguto v Anne Wairimu Githogori [2019] KEHC 283 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 283 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
283
Citation
[2019] KEHC 283 (KLR)
Decided
31 October 2019
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the judgment of Hon. P. O. Muholi(R.M.) dated 15/9/2015, in Nyahururu PMCC.116/2013CoramR.P.V. Wendoh
Holding

The court orders the appellant to refund Kshs.160,000/= to the respondent and that upon payment, the respondent will have 45 days to move out of the suit land or be evicted therefrom.

Facts

The respondent, Anne Wairimu Githogori, filed a plaint seeking a refund of Kshs.166,000/=, including Kshs.160,000/= as the purchase price of LR.Nyandarua/Karagoine/502 (suit land) paid to the appellant, Julius Mwema Nyuguto, and Kshs.6,000/= agency fees. The appellant denied liability and counterclaimed for dismissal of the main suit, eviction, and general damages.

Issues

  1. Whether the appellant should refund the purchase price of the suit land
  2. Whether the respondent should be evicted from the suit land

Reasoning

The court found that the appellant received money from the respondent based on a contract of sale of land and that the appellant failed to perform his part of the contract, leading to the respondent filing the suit. The court also noted that the appellant did not seek interest in his prayers but the trial court awarded it, which was a wrong exercise of discretion.

Outcome

The appeal is upheld, and the trial court's decision is upheld.

Orders

  • Appellant to refund Kshs.160,000/= to the respondent
  • Respondent to have 45 days to move out of the suit land or be evicted therefrom

Remedies

  • Costs of the appeal and the lower court
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case