SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Janet Kitetu v Jacqueline Mwikali [2019] KEHC 3596 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 3596 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
3596
Citation
[2019] KEHC 3596 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppellant seeks a stay of execution of the judgment and decree rendered in the lower court.CoramD. K. Kemei
Holding

The court declines the instant application but gives the appellant fourteen (14) days to comply with the trial court orders of 6 February, 2018 and directs that they pay the auctioneers charges. The Respondent is awarded the costs of this application.

Facts

Appellant Janet Kitetu filed an application for a stay of execution of the judgment and decree rendered in the lower court. The respondent Jacqueline Mwikali opposed the application, citing res judicata and abuse of court process.

Issues

  1. Whether the application is res judicata
  2. Whether the application is an abuse of court process
  3. Who should bear the costs of the application

Reasoning

The court finds that the applicant has not shown substantial loss that would be suffered if the order is not granted, and the application was not brought without inordinate delay.

Outcome

The application is denied.

Orders

  • Appellant given 14 days to comply with the trial court orders of 6 February, 2018
  • Appellant to pay auctioneers charges
  • Respondent awarded costs of the application

Authorities cited

Cases cited (3)
  • Patani and Another v Patani (2003) KLR
  • Chairman, Cooperative Tribunal & 8 Others Ex Parte Management Committee Konza Ranch & Farming Cooperative Society Limited (2014) eKLR
  • Hunker Trading Company Limited v. Elf Oil Kenya Limited [2010] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case