SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenya Power and Lighting Company Ltd v Derosch Ltd t/a Makuti Villas Kilifi [2019] KEHC 5410 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 5410 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
5410
Citation
[2019] KEHC 5410 (KLR)
Decided
12 July 2019
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from a ruling and order of the learned Resident MagistrateCoramA., Honourable P., Muchemi, Otieno P., P.
Holding

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, upholding the trial court's decision that the subordinate court had jurisdiction to adjudicate on the dispute between the parties.

Facts

The Appellant, Kenya Power and Lighting Company Ltd, filed a preliminary objection against the trial court's jurisdiction to hear and determine the Plaintiff's application and the entire suit due to the provisions of Section 59 of the Energy Act, 2006.

Issues

  1. Whether the trial court had jurisdiction to hear and determine the dispute
  2. Whether the learned trial magistrate properly applied the law on jurisdiction

Reasoning

The Court of Appeal held that the learned trial magistrate was bound by the ruling of Honourable P.J. Otieno in considering the provisions of Section 89 of the Energy Act, which did not provide for a customer like the Plaintiff but a Licence and a Commission.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Energy Act, 2006
Cases cited (3)
  • Abok James Odera t/a A.J Odera & Associates v John Patrick Machira t/a Machira & Co. Advocates [2013] eKLR
  • Selle and another vs Associated Motor Boat Company Ltd & Others [1968] EA 123
  • Mukisa Biscuit Manufacturing Co. Ltd –vs- West End Distributors Ltd [1969] EA 696
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case