SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Cabinet Secretary of Lands;Elijah Muema Kitavi & another (Interested Parties) Ex parte Raphael Kakene Muloki & another [2019] KEHC 6427 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 6427 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
6427
Citation
[2019] KEHC 6427 (KLR)
Decided
26 June 2019
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureEx parte application for certiorari, prohibition, and setting aside of decisionsCoramMajanja, Nyamu, Nyarangi
Holding

The ex parte applicants' application is dismissed as the period for seeking to quash the decisions has lapsed, and the application is not valid due to delay.

Facts

The ex parte applicants, Raphael Kakene Muloki and Peter Maingi Kavita, seek to quash and prohibit the implementation of decisions in Minister's Appeals Nos. 110, 111, and 112 of 1994, which were made by the District Commissioner Machakos and upheld by the District Land Adjudication Officer. The decisions affected the land parcel number 1943, which was registered in the names of Kitavi Katulu and Mwania Katulu.

Issues

  1. Whether the Minister can implement decisions already made on appeal
  2. Whether the ex parte applicants are entitled to judicial review of the decisions

Reasoning

The decisions in question were made in 2006 and the ex parte applicants did not seek to quash them within six months as required by the Law Reform Act. The court held that the application is not valid due to delay and the period for seeking to quash the decisions has lapsed.

Outcome

The ex parte applicants' application is dismissed.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Law Reform Act Cap 26, Laws of Kenya
  • Civil Procedure Rules Order 53
Cases cited (3)
  • Municipal Council of Mombasa vs. Republic & Umoja Consultants Ltd Civil Appeal No. 185 of 2001
  • Republic vs. Public Procurement Administrative Review Board & Another Ex Parte Selex Sistemi Integrati Nairobi HCMA No. 1260 of 2007
  • Mureithi & 2 Others vs. Attorney General & 4 Others
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case