SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Peter Kariuki Kinyanjui & another v Margaret Ng’endo [2019] KEHC 7284 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 7284 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
7284
Citation
[2019] KEHC 7284 (KLR)
Decided
15 May 2019
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from a judgment in the Senior Principal Magistrate's CourtCoramC. Meoli
Holding

The Appellants' motion for enlargement of time is dismissed with costs, and the Respondent's motion for release of security funds is granted with costs.

Facts

The Respondent obtained a judgment in her favor in the lower court, awarding her KShs.2,000,000 in general damages. The Appellants appealed, but did not file the record of appeal within the stipulated time. The Respondent then moved to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and release the security funds.

Issues

  1. Whether the Appellants' motion for enlargement of time is valid
  2. Whether the Respondent's motion for release of security funds is valid

Reasoning

The Appellants failed to comply with the consent order to file the record of appeal within 30 days, leading to the dismissal of their appeal. The court cannot grant an enlargement of time due to the Appellants' default.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed, stay orders lapsed, security funds released.

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed with costs
  • The stay orders are lapsed
  • The security funds are released with costs

Remedies

  • Costs awarded to the Respondent
  • Security funds released

Authorities cited

Cases cited (2)
  • Board of Trustees National Social Security Fund v Michael Mwalo [2015] e KLR
  • Kenya Commercial Bank Ltd v Benjoh Amalgamated Ltd (1982) KLR 485
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case