SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Sheikh Mohamed Nunow v Ali Ibrahim Hassan [2019] KEHC 7640 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 7640 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
7640
Citation
[2019] KEHC 7640 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from a judgment dismissing the appellant's suit and granting the respondent's counter-claim.CoramKLR Wendo
Holding

The court finds no merit in the appellant's appeal and dismisses the appeal. The court allows the respondent's counter-claim and grants costs to the respondent.

Facts

The appellant sought to restrain the respondent from interfering with the management of Masjid Nur Mosque, while the respondent sought an injunction against the appellant. The appellant's suit was dismissed for lack of authority.

Issues

  1. Whether the appellant's suit was incompetent for want of authority?
  2. Whether the respondent's counter-claim had merit?

Reasoning

The court ruled that the appellant's suit was incompetent for want of authority, as he failed to list the members of the Masjid Nur Mosque whose authority he claimed to represent. The court also noted that the appellant did not produce any minutes showing his election as a committee member.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed, cross-appeal allowed, costs awarded to respondent.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed.
  • Cross-appeal allowed.
  • Costs to respondent.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Costs of and incidental to all suits shall be in the discretion of the court or judge.
  • The court or judge shall have full power to determine by whom and out of what property and to what extent such costs are to be paid.
Cases cited (2)
  • Kenya Agricultural Research Institute (K.A.R.I.) vs Farah Ali, Chairman Ishahakia Self Help Group and Another (2011) eKLR
  • Tanui and 4 Others vs Birech & 11 Others (1991) KLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case