SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Thachuma Bar Owners Self Help Group v Tharaka Nithi County Government & 2 others [2019] KEHC 7701 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 7701 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
7701
Citation
[2019] KEHC 7701 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeConstitutional PetitionPostureRespondents opposed the petitionCoramBosire, Munya Sila, Lenaola
Holding

The court dismissed the petition due to lack of locus standi and the constitutionality of the Act.

Facts

Petitioner Thachuma Bar Owners Self Help Group alleged that the County Government of Tharaka Nithi was violating their constitutional rights by arresting and charging them under the Tharaka Nithi Alcoholic Drinks Control Act 2015.

Issues

  1. Locus standi of the Petitioner
  2. Lawfulness of Tharaka Nithi County Alcoholic Drinks Control Act 2015
  3. Inconsistency of Section 25(2) of the County Government Act No.17 of 2012 with Article 199(1) of the Constitution
  4. Proper and lawful constitution of the County Liquor Licensing Committee

Reasoning

The court found that the Petitioner did not have locus standi as it failed to clearly describe itself and its interest in the matter. The court also noted that the Act was constitutional and the committee was properly constituted.

Outcome

Dismissed

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • County Government Act 2012
  • Tharaka Nithi County Alcoholic Drinks Control Act 2015
  • Constitution of Kenya 2010
Cases cited (5)
  • Afred Njau & 5 Others -vs- City Council of Nairobi
  • Mirara & 2 Others -vs- Romano K. Mikigu
  • Free Pentecostal Fellowship in Kenya -vs- Kenya Commercial Bank
  • Voi Jua Kali Association
  • Kipsiwo Community Self Help Group
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case