Republic v Public Procurement Administrative Review Board;Shenzhen Instrument Co. Limited & another (Interested Party) Ex parte Kenya Power and Lighting Company Limited [2019] KEHC 9870 (KLR)
- Court
- High Court of Kenya
- Case number
- 9870
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 9870 (KLR)
- Decided
- 26 February 2019
AI Summary
Beta
Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureRespondent's Request for ReviewCoramChaskalson, David, Gaudron, Mason, Thring
Holding
The ex parte applicant's appeal was dismissed as the Respondent's decision was not tainted by procedural impropriety and the first Interested Party had the locus standi to file the Request for Review.
Facts
The ex parte applicant published a tender for the procurement of Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) system. The first Interested Party filed a Request for Review, which the Respondent upheld.
Issues
- Whether the decision was tainted by procedural impropriety
- Whether the first Interested Party lacked the locus standi to file the Request for Review
- Whether the Request for Review was filed out of time
- Whether the tender validity period was illegally extended
- Whether the Respondent violated the ex parte applicant's and the second Interested Party's Right to Legitimate Expectation
- Whether the second Interested Party raised 'new' issues
Reasoning
The Respondent's decision was not tainted by procedural impropriety and the first Interested Party had the locus standi to file the Request for Review. The ex parte applicant's submissions were considered, and the Respondent acted within its jurisdiction.
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The ex parte applicant's appeal was dismissed
Authorities cited
Legislation (3)
- Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Act, 2015
- Fair Administrative Action Act, 2015
- Public Procurement Administrative Review Board Application Number 28 of 2018
Cases cited (4)
- Republic v Kenya Revenue Authority & Another ex parte Bear Africa (K) Ltd
- Phootlas-DMA-Greco Joint Venture v Kenya Railways & Another PPARB No. 18 of 2018
- Paul Kiplagat Birgen & 25 Others v Interim Independent Electoral Commission & 2 Others
- Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Loading judgment…