SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Bettal Services Limited v Cross Continent Ventures Limited (Civil Case 371 of 2015) [2020] KEHC 10232 (KLR) (Civ) (28 October 2020) (Judgment)

[2020] KEHC 10232 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
10232
Citation
[2020] KEHC 10232 (KLR)
Decided
28 October 2020
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAppeal from a decision of the High Court of Kenya at NairobiCoramJ. KAMAU
Holding

The court found that the Plaintiff advanced the Defendant a sum of Kshs 1,984,997/= with interest, and the Defendant breached the terms of the Agreement. The court entered judgment in favor of the Plaintiff for the sum of Kshs 384,997/= with interest.

Facts

The Plaintiff filed a suit against the Defendant seeking repayment of Kshs 9,334,166/= with interest. The Defendant argued that the Plaintiff did not advance the sum as requested, but the Plaintiff presented evidence of an agreement and a loan repayment agreement.

Issues

  1. Whether the Plaintiff advanced the Defendant a sum of Kshs 1,984,997/= with interest
  2. Terms of the Agreement
  3. Variation of the Agreement
  4. Breach of the Agreement
  5. Sum the Plaintiff was entitled to
  6. Costs of the suit

Reasoning

The court determined that the Plaintiff and Defendant entered into an agreement and a loan repayment agreement, and the Defendant breached the terms of the Agreement. The court found that the Plaintiff was entitled to the sum of Kshs 384,997/=. The court also ordered the Defendant to pay the costs of the suit.

Outcome

Partial merit for the Plaintiff, judgment in favor of the Plaintiff for Kshs 384,997/= with interest.

Orders

  • Judgment in favor of the Plaintiff for the sum of Kshs 384,997/= with interest.
  • Order for the Defendant to pay the costs of the suit.

Remedies

  • Judgment for the Plaintiff for the sum of Kshs 384,997/= with interest.
  • Order for the Defendant to pay the costs of the suit.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (1)
  • Vincent M/ Kimwele vs Diamond Shield International Ltd [2018] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case