SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Shreeji Enterprises Ltd v Chai (Civil Appeal 71 of 2019) [2020] KEHC 1385 (KLR) (19 November 2020) (Judgment)

[2020] KEHC 1385 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1385
Citation
[2020] KEHC 1385 (KLR)
Decided
19 November 2020
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from a Ruling of the Mariakani PMCC No. 174 of 2017CoramR. Nyakundi
Holding

The appeal is dismissed with costs, interim stay of 15 days granted with leave to apply.

Facts

The appellant (Shreeji Enterprises Ltd) appealed against the trial court's award for diminished earning capacity and the ruling on the defendant's notice of motion application.

Issues

  1. The trial court's dismissal of the defendant's notice of motion application for review.
  2. The trial court's failure to review part of its judgment.
  3. The trial court's failure to consider the defendant's written submissions on the notice of motion application.
  4. The trial court's failure to consider the authorities relied on by the appellant in his submissions.

Reasoning

The appellate court held that the trial court's decision was not erroneous and that the grounds for appeal were not well-founded in fact and law.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Interim stay of 15 days granted with leave to apply.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (4)
  • Ann Wambui Nderitu v Joseph Kiprono Ropkoi & another C.A. No. 345 of 2000
  • Peters v Sunday Post Limited {1958} EA 424
  • Mary Wanjiku Gachigi v Ruth Muthoni Kamau (Civil Appeal No. 172 of 2000)
  • Virani t/a Kisumu Beach Resort v Phoenix of East Africa Assurance Co. Ltd (Kisumu High Court CC No. 88 of 2002)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case