SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Alex Misigo Matisha v Registrar of Societies; Simon Rugut & 4 others (Interested Parties) [2020] KEHC 2339 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 2339 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2339
Citation
[2020] KEHC 2339 (KLR)
Decided
14 October 2020
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureApplication for Leave to Proceed with Judicial ReviewCoramP. NYAMWEYA
Holding

The Court granted leave to the Applicant to seek a mandamus order but directed that the application be heard on the basis of electronic copies of pleadings and submissions.

Facts

The Applicant filed an application seeking leave to seek a mandamus order compelling the Registrar of Societies to intervene in the affairs of the African Church of the Holy Spirit due to leadership wrangles and financial impropriety. The church is involved in several court cases.

Issues

  1. Whether the instant application is an abuse of the process of court
  2. Whether the Applicant is entitled to leave to seek a mandamus order

Reasoning

The Court noted that the Applicant and some Interested Parties are parties in some of the cited pending cases and that executive officers of the church have dragged the church into court cases.

Outcome

Leave granted

Orders

  • Chamber Summons dated 9th October 2020 to be served on Respondent and Interested Parties
  • Respondent and Interested Parties to file and serve their responses within 21 days
  • Chamber Summons to be heard on 14th December 2020
  • Pleadings and submissions to be filed electronically
  • Service of pleadings and documents to be by way of personal service and electronic mail
  • Affidavits of service evidencing personal service to be filed electronically

Remedies

  • Mandamus order to compel the Respondent to intervene in the affairs of the African Church of the Holy Spirit
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case