SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Cyril Kipruto Serem v Republic [2020] KEHC 2453 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 2453 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2453
Citation
[2020] KEHC 2453 (KLR)
Decided
19 October 2020
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeMiscellaneous Criminal ApplicationPostureReview of Bail ConditionsCoramEDWARD M. MURIITHI
Holding

The High Court has jurisdiction to review a trial court's decision on bail and may reduce bail conditions if the decision is plainly wrong or has resulted in a miscarriage of justice.

Facts

The applicant, Cyril Kipruto Serem, was arrested and detained without warrant by an officer in charge of a police station. He was prepared to give bail and appeared before a court.

Issues

  1. Jurisdiction of the High Court to review a trial court's decision on bail
  2. Whether the High Court should interfere with the trial court's decision on bail

Reasoning

The court reviewed the trial court's decision on bail and found it to be plainly wrong, setting aside the bail bond of six hundred thousand shillings and ordering a new bail bond of two hundred thousand shillings or one hundred thousand shillings as cash bail.

Outcome

The High Court reviewed the bail conditions and reduced them.

Orders

  • The order for bail bond of six hundred thousand shillings (Ksh.600,000/-) with one (1) surety of the same amount imposed on the accused by the trial court is set aside.
  • The Accused shall execute a bond of two hundred thousand shillings (Ksh.200,000/-) with one (1) surety of the same amount; or
  • In the alternative, the accused shall deposit the sum of One hundred thousand shilling (Ksh.100,000/-) as cash bail.

Remedies

  • Reduction of bail conditions

Authorities cited

Legislation (9)
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Act No. 22 of 1959
  • Act No. 6 of 1976
  • Act No. 13 of 1978
  • Act No. 19 of 1984
  • Act No. 19 of 1985
  • Act No. 7 of 1990
  • Act No. 14 of 1991
  • Act No. 5 of 2003
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case