SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Barongo Sevelius Yophen v Geoffrey Nyakundi [2020] KEHC 3244 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 3244 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
3244
Citation
[2020] KEHC 3244 (KLR)
Decided
18 June 2020
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from a judgment and decree of the Chief Magistrates Court
Holding

The appeal is partially allowed. The finding on liability by the trial court is upheld. The award of Kshs. 807,050/= is set aside and substituted with an award of Kshs. 207,050/=. The respondent shall bear 1/3 of the costs of the appeal.

Facts

Respondent Geoffrey Nyakundi filed a suit against appellant Barongo Sevelius Yophen for damages due to a road traffic accident. The trial court found the appellant 100% liable and awarded the respondent Kshs. 807,050/=.

Issues

  1. Determination of liability in road traffic cases
  2. Quantum of damages

Reasoning

The court found the trial court's award of Kshs. 800,000/= to be based on a wrong principle and manifestly excessive. The court substituted the award with Kshs. 207,050/=. The court also corrected the trial court's assessment of general damages.

Outcome

Partial allowance of appeal

Orders

  • Award of Kshs. 207,050/=

Remedies

  • Costs of the appeal shall be borne by the respondent

Authorities cited

Cases cited (5)
  • Michael Hubert Kloss & Another v David Seroney & 5 Others [2009] eKLR
  • Simon Muchemi Atako & another v Gordon Osore CIVIL APPEAL NO. 180 OF 2005 [2013] eKLR
  • G4s Security Service (K) Ltd v Jackline Nagome Barare Civil Appeal No.112,113 &114 of 2015 Consolidated [2017] eKLR
  • George Kinyanjui T/A Climax Coaches & another v Hussein Mahad Kuyale Civil Appeal No. 28 of 2012 [2016] eKLR
  • Channan Agricultural Contractors Ltd v Fred Barasa Mutayo Civil Appeal No. 29 of 2012 [2013] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case