SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Ph Ogolla- Onyango v Daniel Githegi [2020] KEHC 3264 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 3264 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
3264
Citation
[2020] KEHC 3264 (KLR)
Decided
28 August 2020
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAppealPostureAppeal from a judgment and decreeCoramM.W. Muigai
Holding

The court granted a stay of execution pending appeal, subject to the applicant depositing Ksh 500,000 in a joint interest earning account within 90 days.

Facts

The defendant/applicant sought a stay of execution of a judgment and decree issued by Hon. L.J. Farah on 21st June 2019, claiming financial hardship and intending to appeal. The plaintiff/respondent opposed the stay, asserting the judgment was properly rendered and the respondent was entitled to execute the judgment.

Issues

  1. Whether a stay of execution pending appeal should be granted or not.

Reasoning

The court considered the discretionary power to grant or refuse a stay of execution, balancing the applicant's need for a stay against the respondent's right to execute the judgment. The court found the applicant had not demonstrated an arguable appeal and failed to file a memorandum of appeal.

Outcome

Stay of execution granted pending appeal

Orders

  • The applicant must deposit Ksh 500,000 in a joint interest earning account within 90 days

Remedies

  • Stay of execution pending appeal

Authorities cited

Cases cited (5)
  • Butt vs Rent Tribunal (1982) KLR 417
  • Congress Rental South Africa vs Kenyatta International Conference Centre, Cooperative Bank Of Kenya (Garnishee) (2019) eKLR
  • Halal & Another vs Thornton & Turpin Ltd (2014) eKLR
  • Machira T/A Machira & Co. Advocates vs East Africa Standard (No. 2) (2002) 2 KLR 63
  • Onesmus Mburu Njuguna vs Samson Kitire Kuna (2007) eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case