SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Daniel Gachanja Githaiga v Credit Reference Bureau Africa Ltd & 2 others [2020] KEHC 3299 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 3299 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
3299
Citation
[2020] KEHC 3299 (KLR)
Decided
9 September 2020
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil SuitPostureAppeal from the original trial outcomeCoramGRACE L NZIOKA
Holding

The Plaintiff's claim for defamation and compensation is dismissed. The motor vehicle registration number KBL 905 is impounded and sold by public auction. The Plaintiff is ordered to bear his own costs, while the 3rd Defendant is ordered to pay the Plaintiff's costs.

Facts

The Plaintiff, Daniel Gachanja Githaiga, approached Equity Bank Ltd for a loan facility to expand his business. Credit Reference Bureau Africa Ltd and CFC Stanbic Bank Limited issued false information about the Plaintiff, damaging his business and character.

Issues

  1. Defamation by Credit Reference Bureau Africa Ltd and CFC Stanbic Bank Limited
  2. Compensation for loss and damage
  3. Remedies for the Plaintiff's business and character
  4. Impounding of motor vehicle registration number KBL 905

Reasoning

The court found that the Plaintiff did not prove his case against the 1st Defendant and that the Plaintiff shielded the main culprit. The Plaintiff failed to prove his signature was forced or the alleged defamation.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Motor vehicle registration No. KBL 905 be impounded and sold by public auction

Remedies

  • Compensation for loss and damage

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Civil Procedure Rules 2010
  • Banking Act (cap 488) Laws of Kenya
  • Banking (Credit Reference Bureau) Regulations, 2008
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case