SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Jesse Kihenjo Kiambati v Moses Kabata Mwangi [2020] KEHC 350 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 350 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
350
Citation
[2020] KEHC 350 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from a judgment dismissing the appellant's suitCoramDenning L., HANNOX AG, Hancox, KAR Law, KB, LAW
Holding

The trial court erred in dismissing the appellants suit in its entirety and in awarding damages that were inordinately low.

Facts

The appellant Jesse Kihenjo Kiambati filed a suit against the respondent Moses Kabata Mwangi for damages arising from a road traffic accident on June 21, 2015. The appellant claimed he was a fare-paying passenger in motor vehicle registration number KAU 703E when a collision occurred with motor vehicle registration number KBJ 559F, resulting in injuries.

Issues

  1. Whether the trial court erred in dismissing the appellants suit in its entirety
  2. Whether the award on quantum of damages was inordinately low in light of the injuries sustained by the appellant

Reasoning

The court found that the trial court did not consider the evidence of the eye witness PW4, which contradicted the appellant's evidence. The court held that the trial court should have found both drivers equally to blame for the accident.

Outcome

Appeal successful

Orders

  • Set aside the trial court's judgment and remand the case for a new trial

Remedies

  • Remand for a new trial

Authorities cited

Cases cited (3)
  • MWANASONIK vs KENYA US SERVICES LTD (Mombasa) Civil Appeal No. 35 of 1985
  • HUSSEIN OMAR FARAH v LENTO AGENTS (2006) eKLR
  • BAKER V MARKET HARBOROUGH INDUSTRIAL CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD (1953) 1 WLR 1472
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case