SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenya Power & Lighting Co. Ltd v Mathenge Minja Riguga & Keiru Gatiki (Civil Appeal 67 of 2014) [2020] KEHC 4461 (KLR) (12 March 2020) (Directions)

[2020] KEHC 4461 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
4461
Citation
[2020] KEHC 4461 (KLR)
Decided
12 March 2020
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the judgment of the lower court in Nyahururu Senior Principal Magistrates CourtCoramJ.N MULWA
Holding

The High Court declines to hear and determine the appeal due to lack of jurisdiction, and transfers the appeal to the Environment and Land Court at Nyahururu.

Facts

The plaintiffs, Kenya Power & Lighting Co. Ltd, claimed compensation for damaged properties (trees) by the defendant, Mathenge Minja Riguga, in the plaintiffs' land parcels due to electricity lines being laid through the land parcels purportedly with a way leave consent on the use of the plaintiffs' land parcels. The trial court found in favor of the plaintiffs and ordered compensation against the defendant.

Issues

  1. Jurisdiction of the High Court to hear land disputes
  2. Appellate jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court

Reasoning

The High Court found that the High Court has no jurisdiction to hear land disputes except to finalise those that had been part heard before the establishment of the Environment and Land Court. The appeal is from the Magistrate's Court, which has appellate jurisdiction, and thus the High Court declines to hear the appeal.

Outcome

Transfer of the appeal to the Environment and Land Court at Nyahururu

Orders

  • The Deputy Registrar of this Court is directed to send the court file to the ELC Court at Nyahururu, where parties shall mention the appeal before the Judge for directions

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Environment and Land Act NO. 19 of 2011
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.0 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case