SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Nyoro Construction Company Limited v Prashanth Projects Limited & another [2020] KEHC 5694 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 5694 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
5694
Citation
[2020] KEHC 5694 (KLR)
Decided
13 May 2020
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPosturePlaintiff's motion to dismiss for want of prosecutionCoramF. TUIYOTT
Holding

The delay is inordinate and not sufficiently explained, but the suit survives with conditions.

Facts

The Plaintiff filed a suit against the Defendants in March 2015. The last action taken in the matter was a ruling dismissing the Plaintiff's application for injunction on December 4, 2015. The Plaintiff then filed a Civil Application No. 106/2016 in the Court of Appeal, which was dismissed on January 17, 2018.

Issues

  1. Whether the Plaintiff's suit should be dismissed for want of prosecution
  2. Whether the delay in the Court of Appeal matter affected the progress of the suit

Reasoning

The Court finds the delay inordinate and not sufficiently explained, but the Defendants have not shown that the delay has prejudiced them. The Plaintiff is given an opportunity to prosecute the case with conditions.

Outcome

The suit survives with conditions.

Orders

  • The Plaintiff will meet the Defendants' costs of the Notice to Show Cause proceedings
  • The Plaintiff shall take steps towards the hearing within 60 days or the suit shall stand dismissed

Remedies

  • The Plaintiff will meet the Defendants' costs of the Notice to Show Cause proceedings
  • The Plaintiff shall take steps towards the hearing within 60 days or the suit shall stand dismissed

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case