SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Solaris Energy U.S Inc v Tavez Connection Limited, Abel Makau & National Bank of Kenya (Civil Suit 74 of 2019) [2020] KEHC 6318 (KLR) (Commercial and Tax) (14 April 2020) (Ruling)

[2020] KEHC 6318 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
6318
Citation
[2020] KEHC 6318 (KLR)
Decided
14 April 2020
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil SuitPosturePreliminary Objections to SuitCoramMARY KASANGO
Holding

The objections are dismissed with costs, except for the objection regarding the provisions of Order 4 Rule 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules, which is upheld.

Facts

The plaintiff filed a suit against the 1st and 2nd defendants, alleging breach of contract. The defendants raised preliminary objections.

Issues

  1. Undated and unsigned plaint
  2. Lack of authorization for the plaintiff's advocate to file the suit
  3. Lapse in form and procedure in the verifying affidavit

Reasoning

The court finds that the objections are not well-founded and that the plaintiff's pleadings are in compliance with the rules. The court orders the plaintiff to file a verifying affidavit that complies with the Civil Procedure Rules.

Outcome

The suit is allowed to proceed.

Orders

  • The plaintiff is ordered to file a verifying affidavit that complies with Order 4 Rule 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules within 30 days.
  • The plaintiff is ordered to serve the defendants with pleadings that are dated and signed.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Civil Procedure Rules
Cases cited (5)
  • J. N. & 5 others v Board of Management St G. School Nairobi & Another (2017) eKLR
  • Arthi Highway Developers Limited v West End Butchery Limited & 6 Others (2015) eKLR
  • Bugerere CoffeeGrowers Ltd v Sebaduka & Anor (1970) 1 EA 147
  • Tatu Naiga& Emporium vs. Virjee Brothers Ltd Civil Appeal No 8 of 2000
  • United Assurance Co. Ltd v Attorney General (SCCA NO.1 of 1998)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case