SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Joyce Medza Mangale & another v Eden Transporters and Logistics Limited & another [2020] KEHC 6771 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 6771 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
6771
Citation
[2020] KEHC 6771 (KLR)
Decided
21 April 2020
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from a Judgment and Decree of the Honourable Wanjiru Njuguna – Resident MagistrateCoramA., Lord
Holding

The court found that the appellant has not availed settlement evidence to interfere with the assessment of damages, and the trial court's assessment was reasonable and within its discretion.

Facts

The deceased, Emmanuel Masudi Mangale, was on board a moto vehicle registered UAT 758H CE793D owned by Eden Transporters & Logistics Limited and insured in the name of Fustum Tekeste Debesa. The vehicle and trailer got disconnected, overturning and causing the deceased to sustain fatal injuries.

Issues

  1. Whether the appellant has availed settlement evidence for the court to interfere with the assessment of damages
  2. Whether the trial court's assessment of damages was reasonable and within its discretion

Reasoning

The court reiterates the principle that the duty of an appeal court is to rehear the case afresh, dealing with questions of fact and law. The appellant must show insufficient material or legal principles to support the decision. The court found the trial court's assessment of damages to be reasonable.

Outcome

Affirmed

Authorities cited

Cases cited (7)
  • Mwana Sokoni v Kenya Business Limited
  • Abok James Odera T/a A. J. Odera & Associates v John Patrick Michira T/a Michira and Co. Advocates
  • Butt v Khan
  • Southern Engineering Company Ltd v Muzunga Mutia
  • H. West and Son v Shephard
  • Livingstone v Rawyards Coal Company
  • Derrick Munroe v Gordon Robertson
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case