SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Stanley Kirwa Arusei v John Mkwalafu Wanjofu [2020] KEHC 8327 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 8327 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
8327
Citation
[2020] KEHC 8327 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from a judgment of the Eldoret Chief Magistrate's CourtCoramE. N. MAINA, H. A. OMONDI
Holding

The court reduced the general damages award to Kshs. 500,000, finding the original award to be inordinately high and inconsistent with the respondent's injuries.

Facts

The respondent filed a claim for compensation for personal injuries sustained in an accident on January 7, 2016, along the Eldoret-Webuye road. The respondent was awarded Kshs. 1,800,000 in general damages and Kshs. 6,910 in special damages, totaling Kshs. 1,846,910. The appellant appealed the quantum of the general damages.

Issues

  1. Whether the award of Kshs. 1,800,000 in general damages was excessive and inconsistent with the injuries sustained by the respondent.
  2. Whether the award was consistent with past awards in similar cases.

Reasoning

The court found that the respondent's injuries were not as severe as those in the cited cases, and that the original award was based on irrelevant facts and a wrong principle.

Outcome

The appeal is upheld, and the respondent's award is reduced to Kshs. 500,000 in general damages.

Orders

  • The respondent's award is reduced to Kshs. 500,000 in general damages.
  • The special damages are upheld.
  • The appellant is awarded costs of the appeal.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (5)
  • Jitan Nagia v Abidnego Nyandusi Oigo [2018] eKLR
  • Texcal House Service Station Ltd & another v Timo Kalevi Jappinen & Another (supra)
  • Humprey Kango v KPA (supra)
  • Butt v Khan 1[1981] KLR 349
  • Harun Muyoma Boge v Daniel Otieno Agulo [2015] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case