SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Ngaywa Ngigi & Kibet Advocates v Invesco Assurance Company Diamond Trust Bank (Tom Mboya and Koinange Street Branches);(Garnishee) [2020] KEHC 8401 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 8401 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
8401
Citation
[2020] KEHC 8401 (KLR)
Decided
29 January 2020
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeGarnishment ApplicationPostureApplication for garnishment of fundsCoramF. MUCHEMI
Holding

The application is allowed, and the garnishee is ordered to pay Kshs. 160,606/= to the applicant's advocates from the attached funds in the garnishee's accounts.

Facts

The applicant seeks to garnish funds from the garnishee's accounts to satisfy a decree of Kshs. 160,606/= against the respondent. The garnishee has not disputed the application.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant has established a proper case for issuing garnishment orders.
  2. Whether the garnishee is indebted to the judgment debtor.

Reasoning

The court found that the funds in the accounts belong to the judgment debtor and that the garnishee is indebted to the judgment debtor.

Outcome

The application is allowed.

Orders

  • Order nisi is made absolute.
  • The garnishee is ordered to pay Kshs. 160,606/= to the applicant's advocates from the attached funds in the garnishee's accounts.
  • The garnishee is ordered to pay the costs of the application.

Remedies

  • Payment of Kshs. 160,606/= to the applicant's advocates.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (1)
  • Otieno Ragot & Co Advocates v City Council of Nairobi [2015] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case