SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Daniel Wesonga v Republic [2020] KEHC 8996 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 8996 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
8996
Citation
[2020] KEHC 8996 (KLR)
Decided
21 January 2020
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCriminal AppealPostureAppeal from conviction and sentence in Traffic case No.751 of 2019CoramKIARIE WAWERU KIARIE
Holding

The appeal on sentence is allowed. The sentences in counts one and two are set aside and substituted with a fine of Kshs. 3000/= on each count or serve three months imprisonment on each count. The sentence in count three remains as served.

Facts

The appellant, Daniel Wesonga, was convicted in three counts of riding a motor cycle on a public road without a driving license, insurance, and helmet. He pleaded guilty and was sentenced to six months' imprisonment on each count one and two, and 14 days' imprisonment on count three.

Issues

  1. Whether the appellant was given an option of a fine
  2. Whether the trial court erred in sentencing the appellant

Reasoning

The court found that the appellant was not given an option of a fine, and the trial court erred in sentencing him. The court also noted that the sentence was not excessive given the circumstances.

Outcome

The appeal is allowed.

Orders

  • Sentences in counts one and two set aside and substituted with a fine of Kshs. 3000/= on each count or serve three months imprisonment on each count
  • Sentence in count three remains as served

Remedies

  • Fine of Kshs. 3000/= on each count or serve three months imprisonment on each count

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Traffic Act
  • Section 103B (7) of the Traffic Act
Cases cited (4)
  • Okeno vs. Republic (1972) EA 32
  • Ogalo Son of Owuora vs. Republic (1954) 21 EACA 270
  • James vs Rex (1950) 18 EACA 147
  • R vs. Shershewsity (1912) C.CA 28 T.LR 364
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case