SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mabati Rolling Mills Limited v Royal Mabati Factory Limited [2020] KEHC 9666 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 9666 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
9666
Citation
[2020] KEHC 9666 (KLR)
Decided
29 April 2020
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeTrademark DisputePostureAppeal from the original trialCoramHavelock, J.B. Havelock, L., Odunga, P.
Holding

The plaintiff is the registered proprietor of the trademarks 'VERSATILE' and 'ROYAL VERSATILE'. The defendant has used the words 'VERSATILE' to market its products.

Facts

The plaintiff, Mabati Rolling Mills Limited, sued the defendant, Royal Mabati Factory Limited, for trademark infringement and passing off. The plaintiff claimed the defendant was using the word 'VERSATILE' to market its products, which the defendant argued was a disclaimered word.

Issues

  1. Whether the plaintiff is the registered proprietor of the trademarks 'VERSATILE' and 'ROYAL VERSATILE'
  2. Whether the defendant has used the words 'VERSATILE' to market its products

Reasoning

The defendant's argument that the word 'tile' was disclaimed in the plaintiff's trademark was not upheld. The plaintiff's trademark is 'VERSATILE' and 'ROYAL VERSATILE'. The defendant's use of 'VERSATILE' was found to be likely to cause confusion.

Outcome

The defendant was ordered to cease using the word 'VERSATILE' to market its products.

Orders

  • A permanent injunction to restrain the defendant from using the word 'VERSATILE' to market its products

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Trademark Act CAP 506 Laws of Kenya
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case