SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic.v Principal Secretary, Ministry of Internal Security & another Ex Parte Schon Noorani & another [2020] KEHC 9791 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 9791 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
9791
Citation
[2020] KEHC 9791 (KLR)
Decided
19 June 2020
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureApplication for review of a previous judgment and orderCoramChinnappa Reddy, Muriithi, See Sinha
Holding

The application is dismissed as the Respondents cannot prefer an appeal and apply for review simultaneously. The grounds for review must be without unreasonable delay and must be an error apparent on the face of the record.

Facts

The ex parte applicants were found in contempt of court for failing to satisfy a judgment debt of Ksh. 821,529.58. The Respondents, represented by the Solicitor General and the Principal Secretary, Ministry of Internal Security, filed a Notice of Appeal and now seek to vary, review or set aside the previous judgment.

Issues

  1. Whether the Respondents can apply for review after lodging a Notice of Appeal
  2. Whether the grounds for review are met

Reasoning

The court ruled that the Respondents cannot appeal and apply for review at the same time, as per the provisions of Section 80 of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 45 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The court also stated that the grounds for review must be without unreasonable delay and must be an error apparent on the face of the record.

Outcome

The application is dismissed

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010
Cases cited (3)
  • Nyamogo & Nyamogo v Kogo
  • Attorney General & O’rs v Boniface Byanyima
  • Levi Outa v Uganda Transpo
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case