SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

County Government of Migori v Hope Self Help Group [2020] KEHC 98 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 98 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
98
Citation
[2020] KEHC 98 (KLR)
Decided
17 December 2020
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from a judgment of the Trial MagistrateCoramHancox, Platt
Holding

The Court of Appeal found that the trial magistrate erred in law and fact by allowing the suit despite evidence that the Respondent failed to prove the liquidated sum by way of receipts or invoices.

Facts

The County Government of Migori contracted Hope Self Help Group for garbage collection and clearing services. The contract was initially for KShs. 204,188 per month, but was later varied to KShs. 148,500 per month. The Respondent claimed breach of contract and sought payment for the difference in amounts.

Issues

  1. Whether the trial magistrate erred in allowing the suit despite evidence that the Respondent failed to prove the liquidated sum by way of receipts or invoices.
  2. Whether the trial magistrate misdirected himself by failing to appreciate that acceptance of an offer can be manifested and/or validated by conduct of either of the contractual parties.
  3. Whether the trial magistrate erred in law and in fact by failing to take into account that the Respondent by conduct of continuing to work under varied contractual price of KShs. 148,500 and receiving the sum without protest, inferred an acceptance of the offer made by the Appellant to vary the contractual price.

Reasoning

The court held that evidence of negotiations is never admissible to vary the terms of the written contract. However, where there is a latent ambiguity, extrinsic evidence may be given of surrounding facts to explain the ambiguity.

Outcome

Affirmed the judgment of the trial court.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (5)
  • Selle & Ano. -vs- Associated Motor Boat Co. Ltd (1968) EA 123
  • Mwanasokoni –vs- Kenya Bus Service Ltd. (1982-88) 1 KAR 278
  • Kiruga –vs- Kiruga& Another (1988) KLR 348
  • Halsbury’s Laws of England, Vol 4, 4th Edition
  • Hudson’s Building and Engineering Contracts, 10th Edition
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case