SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Rongai Tiles & Sanitary Ware Limited v Commissioner of Domestic Taxes [2020] KEHC 9974 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 9974 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
9974
Citation
[2020] KEHC 9974 (KLR)
Decided
6 August 2020
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeTax AppealPostureAppellant's Application for Stay Pending AppealCoramD. S. MAJAN, D. S. MAJANJA
Holding

The court granted a stay of execution and further enforcement of taxes pending the hearing and determination of the appeal, on condition that the appellant provide a bank guarantee to the respondent.

Facts

The appellant, Rongai Tiles & Sanitary Ware Limited, appealed a decision from the Tax Appeal Tribunal dismissing its appeal. The respondent, Commissioner of Domestic Taxes, demanded Kshs. 410,093,385.00 for taxes, which the appellant claims would lead to its closure.

Issues

  1. Whether the court should grant a stay of enforcement of collection of taxes pending the hearing and determination of the appellant's appeal
  2. How to balance the rights of both parties and ensure the appellant's business remains a going concern

Reasoning

The court considered the substantial amount of taxes demanded and the potential impact on the appellant's business, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. It balanced the rights of both parties and decided to grant a stay to allow the appeal to proceed.

Outcome

The court granted the stay of execution and further enforcement of taxes pending the hearing and determination of the appeal.

Orders

  • A stay of execution and further enforcement of taxes be and is hereby granted pending the hearing and determination of this appeal on condition that the appellant provide a bank guarantee to the respondent from a suitable bank for Kshs. 800,000.00 within 45 days from the date hereof.

Remedies

  • A stay of execution and further enforcement of taxes pending the hearing and determination of the appeal
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.0 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case