SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Shadrack v Director of Public Prosecutions & 3 others; Gitau & 2 others (Intended Interested Party) (Petition 507 of 2019) [2021] KEHC 12717 (KLR) (Constitutional and Human Rights) (17 March 2021) (Ruling)

[2021] KEHC 12717 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
12717
Citation
[2021] KEHC 12717 (KLR)
Decided
17 March 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypePetition for Injunction and Cross-PetitionPosturePetitioner's Petition against Director of Public Prosecutions and Intended Interested Parties' applications for joinder and cross-petitionCoramPresiding Judge
Holding

The Intended Interested Parties have met the threshold to be joined as Interested Parties, and the Petitioner's Petition is not a plagiarized replica of the Intended Interested Parties' Petition.

Facts

Petitioner and Intended Interested Parties were charged jointly in Kibera CMCri Case No. 1372 of 2019. The Intended Interested Parties seek to be joined as Interested Parties to the proceedings.

Issues

  1. Whether the Intended Interested Parties have met the threshold for joinder as Interested Parties.
  2. Whether the Intended Interested Parties' cross-petition is bad in law and warrants dismissal in limine.

Reasoning

The court finds that the Intended Interested Parties have an identifiable stake or legal interest in the proceedings and are not directly involved in the litigation. The court also rules that the Intended Interested Parties cannot file a cross-petition while being joined as Interested Parties.

Outcome

The Intended Interested Parties' applications for joinder and cross-petition are allowed.

Orders

  • The Intended Interested Parties are enjoined as Interested Parties in the proceedings.
  • The Intended Interested Parties' cross-petition is not allowed.

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Civil Procedure Rules
  • Constitution of Kenya (Protection of Rights and Fundamental Freedoms) Practice and Procedure Rules, 2013
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case